The picture should illustrate the product without the paint as well to underpin the fact that the product sold and delivered is not as illustrated in the advertisement/display. The fact that the product on display is sold either in kit format or unpainted etc may or may not be written somewhere in the fine print but I feel that it is not an excuse not to display the product another picture of the product in its “raw” or unfinished / unassembled state.
Hi I am sorry that you feel that way bit this particular picture excluding the base it is glued onto is the raw state of the product. Responded 07 Jan 2025
The picture should illustrate the product without the paint as well to underpin the fact that the product sold and delivered is not as illustrated in the advertisement/display. The fact that the product on display is sold either in kit format or unpainted etc may or may not be written somewhere in the fine print but I feel that it is not an excuse not to display the product another picture of the product in its “raw” or unfinished / unassembled state.
The picture should illustrate the product without the paint as well to underpin the fact that the product sold and delivered is not as illustrated in the advertisement/display. The fact that the product on display is sold either in kit format or unpainted etc may or may not be written somewhere in the fine print but I feel that it is not an excuse not to display the product another picture of the product in its “raw” or unfinished / unassembled state.
The picture should illustrate the product without the paint as well to underpin the fact that the product sold and delivered is not as illustrated in the advertisement/display. The fact that the product on display is sold either in kit format or unpainted etc may or may not be written somewhere in the fine print but I feel that it is not an excuse not to display the product another picture of the product in its “raw” or unfinished / unassembled state.