Sell on Bob Shop
R35.00 shipping Buyer protection programme Stores
Featured shopaygo your Black Friday Premium tech, without the premium price
More Crazy Wednesday Snap Friday Weekend Specials All Crazy Auctions
Help 010 005 6200
Shop by category
 Digital
 Home, Garden & Groceries
 Toys & Baby
 Fashion & Jewellery
 Sports & Health
 Lifestyle
 Collectables
 Automotive
 Business & Industry
 Other Categories
This item has closed 1 buyer bought 1 item

Similar products

Robotime Wooden Model Kit - Solar-Powered Helicopter Version A
Sold

Robotime Wooden Model Kit - Solar-Powered Helicopter Version A

New 1 was available
R59.00
Shipping
R65.00 Standard shipping applies to orders under R100.00, in most areas in South Africa. R35.00 Standard shipping applies to orders over R100.00. Some areas may attract a surcharge surcharge. This will be calculated at checkout if applicable.
Check my rate
The seller has indicated that they will usually have this item ready to ship within 3 business days. Shipping time depends on your delivery address. The most accurate delivery time will be calculated at checkout, but in general, the following shipping times apply:
 
Standard Delivery
Main centres:  1-3 business days
Regional areas: 3-4 business days
Remote areas: 3-5 business days
Seller
Loot(Blacklisted)
95.23 % Positive ratings
Buyer protection
How you're covered
Get it now, pay later

Product details

Condition
New
Location
South Africa
Customer ratings:
1 ratings
Product code
6946785100273
Bob Shop ID
81377838
This item is sold brand new. It is ordered on demand from our supplier and is usually dispatched within 4 - 6 working days

The first operational helicopters were devloped in the 1930s. In this wonderful construction kit piece are slotting together to form a 13mm x 70mm x 60mm helicopter. No glue or tools are needed and detailed instructions are included. When built simply place the helicopter in a sunny spot and solar enegery will make the blades rotate.
 
Publisher: Robotime
Report a problem

Customer ratings: 1 ratings

thanks. Misunderstanding cleared up
24 Dec 2012